Originally brought up in #7081 (comment)
As part of the patching and the new patch-iteration workflow, we re-reproduce the original bug before working on it. That is good per se, but may be problematic:
- Some reproducers are somewhat flaky. What if it didn't crash by chance?
- Some reproducers may trigger several different bugs, which may require different fixes.
It feels like crash.Reproduce should do not one, but N repro attempts. And then we should ask some sub-agent to determine which of the results we should pass on?
When we know the original bug title / crash report, it would be nice to use it as well.
Originally brought up in #7081 (comment)
As part of the
patchingand the newpatch-iterationworkflow, we re-reproduce the original bug before working on it. That is good per se, but may be problematic:It feels like
crash.Reproduceshould do not one, butNrepro attempts. And then we should ask some sub-agent to determine which of the results we should pass on?When we know the original bug title / crash report, it would be nice to use it as well.